— Blogs —
—Products—
Consumer hotline +8618073152920 WhatsApp:+8615367865107
Address:Room 102, District D, Houhu Industrial Park, Yuelu District, Changsha City, Hunan Province, China
Product knowledge
Time:2024-02-20 15:23:05 Popularity:4730
A soil moisture sensor and a tensiometer are both used to monitor soil water conditions, but they measure different physical quantities. A dielectric soil moisture sensor estimates how much water is present in the soil, while a tensiometer measures how strongly water is held by the soil matrix.
The main difference between a soil moisture sensor and a tensiometer is the measurement itself. A soil moisture sensor commonly reports volumetric water content (VWC) as a percentage, whereas a tensiometer measures soil matric potential or suction, commonly expressed in kilopascals (kPa) or centibars (cbar).
Both measurements can support agricultural irrigation management, greenhouse cultivation, orchard monitoring and soil research. However, they provide complementary information and should not be treated as interchangeable.
| Comparison | Dielectric Soil Moisture Sensor | Conventional Tensiometer |
|---|---|---|
| Main Measurement | Volumetric water content | Soil matric potential or suction |
| Typical Unit | % VWC or m³/m³ | kPa or cbar |
| Measurement Principle | Electrical or electromagnetic response of soil | Hydraulic equilibrium through a porous ceramic cup |
| Sensing Element | Electrodes, rods or dielectric sensing structure | Porous ceramic cup connected to a water-filled tube |
| Data Collection | Electronic output to a display, logger or controller | Manual gauge or electronic pressure transducer |
| Installation | Sensing area positioned at the required soil depth | Ceramic cup positioned in the target soil layer |
| Dry Soil Conditions | Depends on the model and calibrated measurement range | Limited by loss of hydraulic continuity at high suction |
| Maintenance | Inspection of probe, cabling and measurement quality | Water filling, air removal and ceramic cup maintenance |
| Typical Use | Soil water content trends, irrigation and water-balance studies | Soil water tension monitoring and irrigation decisions |
These differences refer to common dielectric soil moisture probes and conventional water-filled tensiometers. Other soil water potential instruments, including solid-state or granular matrix sensors, may use different sensing principles and have different operating ranges.
A soil moisture sensor measures or estimates water content within a localized volume of soil surrounding its sensing element.
Many electronic agricultural sensors use dielectric measurement technologies, such as Frequency Domain Reflectometry (FDR), capacitance-based sensing or Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR).
These technologies use the relationship between soil water content and apparent dielectric properties to estimate volumetric water content.
Volumetric water content is the volume of water divided by the total soil volume being measured.
VWC (%) = (Water Volume / Total Soil Volume) × 100
For example, 25% VWC indicates that approximately 25% of the measured soil volume is occupied by water.
This value does not directly establish whether a crop has sufficient available water. Plant water availability also depends on soil water-retention characteristics, rooting conditions and other factors.
Water has a substantially higher relative dielectric permittivity than most dry soil minerals and air. When water content changes, the electrical response of the surrounding soil also changes.
The sensor evaluates this response and converts it into estimated water content using a calibration relationship.
FDR instruments analyze frequency-domain electrical behavior, while TDR instruments evaluate electromagnetic pulse propagation and reflection.
Measurement accuracy can be affected by soil texture, bulk density, temperature, salinity, calibration and probe installation.
The NBL-S-THR Soil Temperature and Moisture Sensor is an example of an electronic agricultural soil probe used to measure soil temperature and moisture.
A soil tensiometer measures soil matric potential, commonly reported as soil water tension or suction.
Unlike a dielectric soil moisture sensor, a tensiometer does not directly measure how much water occupies the soil volume. Instead, it measures the pressure condition associated with water held within the soil matrix.
Soil water tension provides information about how strongly water is retained by the soil. As soil dries, the remaining water is generally held more tightly.
A conventional tensiometer contains three main components: a porous ceramic cup, a water-filled tube and a pressure gauge or electronic pressure transducer.
The ceramic cup is inserted into the soil at the desired measurement depth. The cup must remain in suitable hydraulic contact with the surrounding soil.
When the soil becomes drier, water tends to move from the tensiometer through the porous ceramic cup into the surrounding soil. This creates negative pressure inside the sealed water-filled instrument.
The gauge or pressure transducer measures this pressure difference, which is related to the soil matric potential.
Soil Drying → Water Exchange Through Ceramic Cup → Negative Pressure → Tension Reading
When the soil becomes wetter, the suction generally decreases as the hydraulic conditions change.

Soil matric potential is commonly represented as a negative pressure relative to a reference state. Tensiometer gauges often show the corresponding suction magnitude as a positive reading.
For example, a reported suction of 30 kPa corresponds approximately to a matric potential of −30 kPa under the relevant measurement conventions.
One centibar (cbar) is numerically equal to one kilopascal (kPa).
As soil becomes drier, the suction magnitude generally increases. However, the relationship between suction and actual volumetric water content depends on the soil.
Soil moisture and soil water potential are related, but they answer different questions.
Volumetric water content answers: How much water is present in the measured soil volume?
Soil matric potential answers: How strongly is water held by the soil matrix?
These measurements cannot be converted into each other using one universal formula for all soils.
Sandy soils generally contain larger pores and often release water at relatively low suction values. Clay-rich soils contain many smaller pores and may retain substantial amounts of water at higher suction values.
As a result, two soils with the same volumetric water content can have very different soil water potentials.
For example, a measured VWC of 25% does not necessarily indicate the same plant water conditions in sandy and clay-rich soils.
The relationship between VWC and matric potential is described by a soil water-retention curve, sometimes called a soil moisture characteristic curve.
A conversion is possible when a suitable soil water-retention relationship is available for the soil being measured.
However, the conversion depends on soil texture, structure, bulk density and other properties. Wetting and drying can also follow different retention relationships because of hysteresis.
Without a suitable soil-specific relationship, a tensiometer reading should not be presented as a directly measured VWC percentage.
A conventional water-filled tensiometer is most useful over the relatively wet portion of the soil water-potential range.
Many conventional tensiometers have a practical operating range extending from near zero suction to approximately 70–85 kPa, depending on instrument construction and operating conditions.
At high suction, cavitation or air entry can interrupt the water column. When hydraulic continuity is lost, the reading may no longer represent the actual soil matric potential.
The practical range is therefore limited by the physics of a water-filled tensiometer, not simply by the scale printed on its pressure gauge.
Other soil water-potential sensors, such as appropriate granular matrix or solid-state instruments, can use different measurement methods and may cover a wider range. Their specifications should not be assumed to be the same as those of conventional tensiometers.
A dielectric moisture sensor and a tensiometer measure different quantities, so their accuracy cannot be directly ranked using one common percentage or pressure error.
For an electronic VWC sensor, measurement performance depends on the dielectric measurement method, calibration, soil properties, electronics and installation quality.
For a tensiometer, performance depends on the pressure measurement device, ceramic cup, hydraulic contact, absence of air in the water column and operation within its usable suction range.
A tensiometer does not necessarily require repeated calibration to maintain accuracy. However, it requires appropriate hydraulic maintenance, including water filling and air removal when necessary.
An electronic soil moisture sensor also should not be assumed to be accurate under every soil condition simply because it is factory-calibrated.
A suitable instrument should be chosen according to the parameter required, operating range, soil conditions and necessary measurement uncertainty.
Both devices must be installed at soil locations and depths relevant to the crop root zone or monitoring objective.
The sensing rods or electrode structure should be positioned at the intended measurement depth, with suitable contact between the sensing area and the surrounding soil.
Air gaps, stones, soil disturbance and unsuitable placement can affect the representativeness of the measurement.
A soil moisture sensor does not always need to be inserted deeply. Shallow or deep installation may be appropriate depending on the crop and measurement objective.
The porous ceramic cup of a conventional tensiometer is installed directly in the soil at the required measurement depth.
The cup must maintain hydraulic contact with the soil. The instrument is filled and prepared according to its operating instructions, with air removed from the water column as required.
The pressure gauge or electronic reading equipment may remain accessible above ground, but the ceramic sensing cup measures the hydraulic condition of the soil at its installed depth.
It is incorrect to describe a conventional tensiometer as measuring the soil only at the surface through a separate suction hose.
Both soil moisture sensors and tensiometers can provide useful information for irrigation scheduling. The choice depends on the crop, soil conditions, irrigation method and the parameter used by the management strategy.
A VWC sensor is useful when the project needs to monitor changes in soil water content, compare irrigation events or estimate changes in stored soil water over a defined profile.
For multi-depth irrigation monitoring, sensors at several depths can help identify how water moves through the monitored root zone.
Electronic soil moisture sensors can also connect to compatible data loggers and IoT gateways for repeated monitoring and remote data acquisition.
A tensiometer is useful when irrigation decisions are based on soil matric suction within the instrument's operating range.
Conventional tensiometers are commonly applied in horticulture, vegetable production and relatively frequent irrigation systems where soil water tension is monitored before the soil becomes excessively dry.
The relevant irrigation thresholds depend on the crop, soil type and management objective. One tension threshold should not be applied universally to all soils.
Yes. Combining volumetric water content and matric potential measurements can provide complementary information about soil water conditions.
For example, a VWC sensor can show changes in the amount of water in the root zone, while a tensiometer can provide information about the matric suction associated with those conditions.
Using both measurements can also support evaluation of the soil water-retention relationship under suitable monitoring and research conditions.
| Monitoring Objective | Instrument to Consider |
|---|---|
| Measure Volumetric Water Content (%) | Dielectric soil moisture sensor |
| Measure Soil Matric Suction (kPa) | Tensiometer or suitable water-potential sensor |
| Monitor Wetting After Irrigation | Soil moisture sensor at representative depths |
| Monitor Water Tension in Frequently Irrigated Soil | Conventional tensiometer where its range is suitable |
| Evaluate Soil Water-Retention Characteristics | Appropriate water-content and water-potential measurements |
| Remote Soil Moisture Monitoring | Electronic sensor with compatible data logger or IoT gateway |
| Continuous Water-Potential Logging | Electronic tensiometer or suitable water-potential transmitter |
Soil type, measurement depth, maintenance requirements, output interface, power supply and expected measurement range should be confirmed before selecting a system.

A1. A dielectric soil moisture sensor estimates volumetric water content, while a conventional tensiometer measures soil matric potential or suction. They measure different aspects of soil water conditions.
A2. No. A tensiometer measures matric suction in units such as kPa or cbar. Converting a tension reading to volumetric moisture requires an appropriate soil water-retention relationship.
A3. Conventional water-filled tensiometers have a limited suction range because the water column can lose hydraulic continuity at high suction. Other water-potential technologies may be needed for much drier soil conditions.
A4. There is no direct universal comparison because the two instruments measure different parameters. Their accuracy must be assessed against the specific measurement quantity, reference method and operating conditions.
A5. Both may be suitable. A VWC sensor tracks water content near the root zone, while a tensiometer provides matric suction measurements useful for suitable irrigation-threshold strategies. Soil type, crop and control objectives determine the better choice.
A6. Electronic soil moisture sensors and tensiometers equipped with suitable pressure transmitters may connect to compatible data loggers or monitoring systems. A conventional manual tensiometer does not provide a digital output without additional instrumentation.
NiuBoL provides soil moisture, temperature and related agricultural monitoring instruments for irrigation management, greenhouses, field monitoring and environmental applications.
The NBL-S-THR Soil Temperature and Moisture Sensor measures volumetric soil moisture and temperature for connection to compatible monitoring equipment.
For soil matric suction measurements, use a suitable tensiometer or soil water-potential sensor with a measurement range appropriate for the soil and irrigation application.
For instrument selection, confirm whether the project requires soil water content, matric suction or both, together with installation depth, measurement range, power supply, signal output and data acquisition requirements.
Related recommendations
Sensors & Weather Stations Catalog
Agriculture Sensors and Weather Stations Catalog-NiuBoL.pdf
Weather Stations Catalog-NiuBoL.pdf
Agriculture Sensors Catalog-NiuBoL.pdf
Water Quality Sensor Catalog-NiuBoL.pdf
Related products
Combined air temperature and relative humidity sensor
TDR Soil Moisture & Temperature Sensor for irrigation| RS485 |4-20mA| NBL-S-THR
Soil pH sensor RS485 soil Testing instrument soil ph meter for agriculture |NBL-S-PH
Wind Speed sensor Output Modbus/RS485/Analog/0-5V/4-20mA
Tipping bucket rain gauge for weather monitoring auto rainfall sensor RS485/Outdoor/stainless steel
Pyranometer Solar Radiation Sensor 4-20mA/RS485
Screenshot, WhatsApp to identify the QR code
WhatsApp number:+8615367865107
(Click on WhatsApp to copy and add friends)